Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Piltdown  Hoax


The Piltdown Hoax was a supposed discovery made by Charles Dawson in 1912 in the Southern town of Louis in the Piltdown village, he claimed that he had found  a piece of an ancient human skull. Dawson invited Arthur Smith Woodward a leading geologist in England and Father Pierre who was a french paleontologist, the discovery became popular very quick because nobody had found remains of primitive humans in England. Later, Dawson found a jaw bone that he argued was part of the skull he found before. Dawson's discovery was important to the scientific community because the jaw bone was similar to that of an ape but with teeth similar to those of humans, and this showed a connection between humans and apes. If this discovery would have been real it would have taught us how similar we are to apes, and the importance of fossil discoveries, how they can help us build connections between  the past and the present (which I believe they do). They started to discover there was something not quite right about the Piltdown discovery when scientist found ancient remains in Asia and Africa and the fossils were far different from the Piltdown fossils , the fossils they found were from human ancestors that lived thousands of years after the Piltdown fossils and unlike the Piltdown fossils the skulls were less human.The Piltdown hoax had many effects on the scientific community, for example, it mislead scientist to do research based on the Piltdown discovery and some others were supporting theories with this fake discovery, the model of Piltdown man dominated research of human evolution for example Arthur Keeth this was convenient because it proved his personal theory of human evolution, he believed that humans developed big brains before they walked up right.


The human faults in the Piltdown discovery were ambition, jealousy, the thirst of fame and to increase his ego by gaining scientific prestige. All of these faults negatively affected Dawson's scientific process for the Piltdown discovery, because they putted self interest first before actual an d objective science, to obtain a desired result they manipulated the objects they had like the skull, and the bone jaw and conveniently molded the teeth on the jaw to make the look familiar to human teeth and pretending to find them by digging. 

The scientific offered new and more advanced techniques in the scientific process to reveal the skull to be a fraud. The new technologies used to prove that the Piltdown discovery was a fraud were; first they ran a fluorine test, the results showed that the fossils were very young like hundreds of years instead of millions of years. They also ran a full scale analysis that gave them better datings methods, it also discovered that the stains on the fossils were artificial. they used a microscope and discovered that the teeth had beed purposely scratched and filed down to get a particular shape. 

In my opinion it is impossible to remove human factors completely to reduce the chance of this errors, we can't close our eyes to the possibility of making similar mistakes today, because scientists are also humans and make mistakes sometimes led by their egos and personal interests. I would not like to remove human factors completely because just like they mislead scientist to make mistakes it also gives them an instinct to do and discover great things, for example a scientist curiosity would lead them to make more discoveries to do more research. there is a part in the video that relates to this question and it says "good science depends on national objectivity when national pride or self interest obscure this objectivity than scientists become as vulnerable as the rest of us, to lies, cheat and deceptions."

The Piltdown discovery thought me a big lesson about how people can manipulate information to have you believe what they want you to believe. I learned that we always have to question the information and do independent research to be sure that the information we are getting is accurate. For example, before it was believed that scientist were gentleman an no one would believe that they would do something like a fake discovery, but now we know it happened so it made us aware of that too. It taught us that we can't even trust those with great knowledge or a good reputation, because they are also humans and they make mistakes. 

3 comments:

  1. In general, good synopsis, particularly because you go onto discuss how ongoing fossil discoveries were contradicting Piltdown, leading to the retesting of the fossil. One problem:

    "... this showed a connection between humans and apes."

    This is just an alternative way of saying "missing link", which (as explained in the guidelines) is not a valid significance of this fossil find. By this time, it wasn't really an issue as to whether humans and non-human apes were related. It wasn't about "if" they were genetically related, but how humans had evolved from that common ancestor with non-human apes. So what would this discovery have taught us about "how" humans evolved? Why was the size of the Piltdown cranium relative to the comparatively "primitive" nature of the Piltdown jaw?

    I agree with your discussion on the faults of the perpetrators that possibly drove them to create the hoax in the first place. Other than the culprits, can you find fault with anyone else? How about the scientific community? Why did they accept this find so readily without proper scrutiny? What might have inspired them (particularly the British scientists) to not do their jobs properly when it came to this particular fossil?

    Who conducted the fluorine analysis test that uncovered the hoax? Otherwise, good job explaining the technology that uncovered the hoax, but what about scientific process itself? Why were scientists still studying this find some 40 years after it was uncovered? What aspect of science does that represent?

    Great discussion on the issue of the "human factor". I agree with your conclusions.

    Very good life lesson.

    ReplyDelete
  2. hello Marlin,
    Your post was so great to read and well written. I think that you very clearly explained exactly what the Hoax was and it was very informative. I agree that jealousy was the over all emotion behind this hoax. People very much want to have all eyes on them and be the center of attention. This entire hoax focused on Dawson and gave him the fame he wanted, for a while. He still has fame to this day but it for the exact opposite reason he wanted. Also, I agree that as a society people tend to be very manipulative. Sometimes people are so good at getting what they want and getting other people to do what they want, we cannot see through the hoax. IT is a very sad part of human nature but in a lot of ways it has made us who we are. This entire situation was a big manipulation of an entire field of study, not something that would be easy to pull off! Thank you for your post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really enjoy your life lesson. It shows what the truth is. You cannot simply trust everything. Other than that I thought your whole response was very entreating and very well written. Keep up the good worK!

    ReplyDelete